In some of my recent blog posts, I wondered about the utility of calling the bluff of creationists and going with their argument of “teaching all views” regarding evolution, creationism, etc. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this June 18th cartoon from Non Sequitur just nails it
Posts Tagged ‘satire’
Posted by mattusmaximus on June 19, 2012
Posted in creationism, education, humor | Tagged: alien, biology, cartoon, Christianity, comedy, creationism, education, evolution, fundamentalist, funny, government, humor, ID, intelligent design, Non Sequitur, origin of life, public, Raelians, religion, satire, schools, science, teach all views, teach the controversy, theory, truth | Leave a Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on April 26, 2012
If you know who Don McLeroy is (and if you don’t, read up on him here), then you know he is quite notorious for being reality-challenged. In what I can only describe as a stroke of comedic genius, Stephen Colbert interviews McLeroy on the Colbert Report. Enjoy
Posted in creationism, education, humor, politics | Tagged: academic freedom, biology, board of education, Christianity, Colbert Report, comedy, Comedy Central, creationism, Daily Show, democracy, Discovery Institute, Don McLeroy, evolution, fundamentalist, funny, humor, ID, intelligent design, Jon Stewart, National Center for Science Education, NCSE, politics, primary, pseudoscience, publishing, religion, satire, science, scientific creationism, Stephen Colbert, Texas, Texas Board of Education, Texas Freedom Network, textbook selection, textbooks, theocracy, Wedge document | 1 Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on March 3, 2012
I am happy to announce that Science Debate 2012 is now accepting your submissions for questions to ask the candidates in the 2012 U.S. presidential elections. Recall the list of questions from Science Debate in the 2008 election cycle, and you’ll get a pretty good idea of how this entire thing works. Basically, it is to put questions of scientific, engineering, and technological importance into the political debate; considering as how important these issues are and will be in the 21st-century, I think it is more than appropriate to hold our political candidates accountable on such matters. I also like how Shawn Otto and the Science Debate team put it:
Why is this important?
In 2008, the ScienceDebate initiative successfully elevated science and engineering topics in the public dialogue that simply would not have been priorities without our efforts.
To give you an example, when we started, of the 2,975 questions asked the then-candidates for president, just six mentioned “climate change” or “global warming” which, no matter your opinion, is among the top science policy debates. None of the candidates wanted to talk about science at all. The topic wasn’t even on Barack Obama’s radar.
By the time we were done, the candidates for president had answered the top 14 science questions facing America. Those answers made more than 850 million media impressions, reframing science as a national priority. President Obama’s answers formed the early basis of his science policy. For the first time, a president went into office with a science policy and a clear idea of how science fit into a larger strategic agenda. He drew his top science appointments from among our most visible early supporters – including John Holdren, Jane Lubchenco, Steven Chu, Harold Varmus, and Marcia McNutt – and mentioned our mission statement – restoring science to its rightful place – in his inaugural address.
In many ways, the ScienceDebate effort helped bring focus and voice to the value of science in America, and made it a more common topic in the general public’s dialogue. With this step-by-step, incremental advance, the ScienceDebate initiative had large influence and produced benefits for all Americans.
Today, anti-science forces are more vocal than ever, and ScienceDebate is even more important than it was in 2008. Our efforts present critical science policy questions in the way American adults are used to taking in complex information: the context of the national policy dialogue. With so many national issues revolving around science and engineering, your support of ScienceDebate is more important than ever.
If you value public policy based on knowledge instead of ideology, we need your financial support. Please give now, and join our conversation.
-Shawn Otto and the team at ScienceDebate.Org
Posted in politics, science funding, skeptical community | Tagged: 2008, 2012, candidates, congress, Democrats, GOP, humor, investment, politics, president, President Bush, President Obama, presidential, questions, Republican, Romney, satire, science, Science Debate, Science Debate 2008, science funding, Shawn Otto, submission, submit, Tea Party, technology, United States | Leave a Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on December 3, 2011
As a fun way of sharing some skepticism of “miraculous vision” claims, I wanted to share with you a really funny YouTube a friend sent me. It pokes fun at the phenomenon of pareidolia, wherein people claim to see all manner of wild things – Jesus, the Virgin Mary, aliens, Michael Jackson, etc – in everything from the clouds to their shower curtain. Of course, we know from modern science that these are illusions of perception, because our brains are marvelous pattern recognition machines, causing us to sometimes see things that are not really there.
Okay, enough seriousness. Time for some fun… check out the “Jesus Toast” video, and share it with a friend. Enjoy!
Posted in humor, psychology | Tagged: Christ, Christianity, fun, God, grill cheese, humor, illusion, Jesus, pareidolia, perception, psychology, religion, satire, spoof, toast, video, Virgin Mary, youtube | Leave a Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on October 30, 2011
You may recall a new effort in 2008 by the scientific community and backers of science to become more active in the United States’ political process, and I am happy to (re)announce that Science Debate is back for the 2012 election cycle!
Is America ceding its capacity to lead?
Science Debate 2012 is a grassroots initiative spearheaded by a growing number of scientists and other concerned citizens. The signatories to our “Call for Presidential and Congressional Debates on Science & Technology” include the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the Council on Competitiveness, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, over 150 leading universities and associations, Nobel laureates and other leading scientists, major business leaders, presidents of universities and major associations, congresspersons of both major political parties, religious leaders, former presidential science advisors, the editors of America’s major science journals, writers, and many others.
We have noticed that science and technology lie at the center of a very large number of the policy issues facing our nation and the world – issues that profoundly affect our national and economic security as science and technology continue to transform our lives. No matter one’s political stripe, these issues pose important pragmatic policy challenges – challenges that are too important and too impactful on people’s lives to be left unaddressed.
We believe these scientific and technological policy challenges can bring out the best in the entrepreneurial American spirit. America can be a leader in finding cures for our worst diseases, inventing the best alternative energy sources, enjoying the most pristine and biologically wealthy environment, and graduating the most scientifically literate children in the world – or we can cede these economic and humanitarian benefits to other countries.
Leadership is about articulating a vision for the future and making it happen. Will America lead, or will it step aside and be swept along as others take the reins?
We believe a debate on these issues would be the ideal opportunity for America and the candidates to explore our national priorities, and it is hard to imagine any candidate not wishing to be involved in such an occasion.
Please join us and work to make Science Debate 2012 a reality nationally, and in your congressional district.
And, last but not least, if you harbor any doubts that now, more than ever, is the time for a serious national political discussion of science, science education, and its implications, then just take a few minutes to watch this video clip from the Daily Show…
Posted in politics, science funding, skeptical community | Tagged: 2008, 2012, candidates, congress, Daily Show, Democrats, GOP, humor, investment, Jon Stewart, politics, president, President Bush, President Obama, presidential, Republican, Romney, satire, science, Science Debate, Science Debate 2008, science funding, Science What's it up to?, Shawn Otto, Tea Party, technology, United States | 1 Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on August 8, 2010
Do you remember a rag of a magazine way back in the day (well, way back in my day) called Cracked? It was kind of like the unpopular wanna-be version of the more well-known and liked Mad Magazine. Well, Cracked has come back with a vengeance, because now they have a really well-written & hilarious online presence over at Cracked.com – if biting satire & rough language is your thing, check them out
So why am I going on and on about Cracked.com? Well, every now and then they come out with a really good skeptical article – and I mean really good. I wanted to share with you one of my favorites which I ran across awhile back, called 5 Ways “Common Sense” Lies To You Everyday…
Albert Einstein said common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of 18. It is also a result of some pervasive and extremely stupid logical fallacies that have become embedded in the human brain over generations, for one reason or another. These malfunctioning thoughts–several of which you’ve had already today–are a major cause of everything that’s wrong with the world. …
I highly recommend this article as required reading for anyone who wants a quick primer on sloppy, uncritical thinking & how we fool ourselves. Not to mention, it’s funny! Read more: http://www.cracked.com/article_17142_5-ways-common-sense-lies-you-everyday.html
Posted in humor, internet, psychology | Tagged: appeal to probability, common sense, Cracked, Cracked.com, critical thinking, funny, historian's fallacy, humor, logic, logical fallacies, logical fallacy, Mad, magazine, Nirvana fallacy, psychology, regression fallacy, satire, skepticism, special pleading | 1 Comment »