Two Steps Forward, One Step Back for Women & Science
Posted by mattusmaximus on May 11, 2010
This post is going to be one of those stereotypical “I’ve got some good news and some bad news” kind of stories. Since I can do nothing to avoid the cliche, I shall sally forth…
Good News! – America’s favorite birth control method turns 50 🙂
A world without “the pill” is unimaginable to many young women who now use it to treat acne, skip periods, improve mood and, of course, prevent pregnancy. They might be surprised to learn that U.S. officials announcing approval of the world’s first oral contraceptive were uncomfortable. …
But on the flip side, there is also Bad News – Group Backs Ritual ‘Nick’ as Female Circumcision Option 😦
In a controversial change to a longstanding policy concerning the practice of female circumcision in some African and Asian cultures, the American Academy of Pediatrics is suggesting that American doctors be given permission to perform a ceremonial pinprick or “nick” on girls from these cultures if it would keep their families from sending them overseas for the full circumcision.
The academy’s committee on bioethics, in a policy statement last week, said some pediatricians had suggested that current federal law, which “makes criminal any nonmedical procedure performed on the genitals” of a girl in the United States, has had the unintended consequence of driving some families to take their daughters to other countries to undergo mutilation.
So let me get this straight… within a few days of celebrating the 50th anniversary of “The Pill”, probably one of the greatest inventions for sex education of women ever & a great triumph for medical science, the AAP is recommending that its pediatricians consider endorsing superstitious, misogynistic nonsense (female “circumcision” – read “genital mutilation”) as a way of somehow appealing to people who want to mutilate their daughters? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
Wow… sometimes truth really is stranger than fiction.