Posted by mattusmaximus on August 16, 2016
Last summer I posted about how Science Debate is gearing up for the 2016 elections in the United States, in order to encourage the presidential and Congressional candidates to publicly debate science policy and science-related issues.

Now that the heat of the 2016 U.S. campaign season is upon us, with the first public debates between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump (and possibly Libertarian Gary Johnson) a bit over a month away, it is imperative that we speak out to get the debate hosts and these campaigns to make science a part of these debates. In fact, it isn’t just science geeks like me calling for such a debate, as – according to this 2015 poll – vast majorities of Americans (of all political stripes) wish for such a debate…

“An overwhelming majority of Americans (87%) say it is important that candidates for President and Congress have a basic understanding of the science informing public policy issues, including majorities across the political spectrum (92% of Democrats, 90% of Republicans and 79% of Independents). Americans also say the presidential candidates should participate in a debate to discuss key science-based challenges facing the United States, such as healthcare, climate change, energy, education, innovation and the economy, with 91% of Democrats, 88% of Republicans and 78% of Independents agreeing.”
So please pass the word, sign the Science Debate petition, or donate to the cause. One of the best ways to spread the word is to push for a ground-swell of support on social media and by contacting the campaigns directly. Toward that end, here is some advice from Shawn Otto, the founder of Science Debate…
Please alert your networks. Here is sample tweet language:
ScienceDebate’s
https://twitter.com/SciDebate/status/764063589078474752
or mine:
https://twitter.com/ShawnOtto/status/763755796626755584
or Sigma Xi’s
https://twitter.com/SigmaXiSociety/status/763742160743124994
Separately, here’s a tweet from MediaMatters emphasizing our urging of the press to do a better job of covering science, engineering, tech, health & environmental issues this cycle:
https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/763379155777880064
When using social media use the #ScienceQs hashtag (hint: search here for other tweets). You may also reference the twitter handles of ScienceDebate and the candidates: @HillaryClinton @realDonaldTrump @GovGaryJohnson @DrJillStein @SciDebate @ShawnOtto @Sheril_ @aaas @theNASEM
English http://sciencedebate.org/20questions
Spanish http://sciencedebate.org/20preguntas
A sampling of some of the initial domestic coverage on the questions (which should also be shared on social media – the more this is out there, the more pressure candidates will feel to respond promptly):
http://time.com/4445585/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-science-climate-change/?xid=tcoshare
http://www.cnn.com/videos/spanish/2016/08/11/exp-cnne-20-questions-about-science-for-candidates.cnn
http://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/debating-science-in-the-2016-election/
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/us-science-groups-have-20-questions-candidates
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/08/10/challenge-to-presidential-candidates-debate-about-science/
http://www.univision.com/noticias/planeta/las-20-preguntas-que-cientificos-urgen-a-clinton-y-trump-a-responder
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/46754/title/Questioning-the-Presidential-Candidates-on-Science/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/groups-ask-candidates-what-about-science/article/2599053
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10082016/scientists-call-presidential-candidates-address-key-science-issues-hillary-clinton-donald-trump
http://www.geekwire.com/2016/presidential-candidates-science-debate-quiz/
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0811/Scientists-have-20-burning-questions-for-presidential-candidates
https://www.inverse.com/article/19467-twenty-science-questions-for-the-next-president
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08/10/fifty-six-prominent-organizations-urge-media-press-presidential-candidates-science/212293
News releases by some of the partners:
http://wildlife.org/groups-urge-presidential-candidates-to-address-science/
http://fisheries.org/2016/08/afs-joins-over-50-leading-american-nonpartisan-organizations-in-call-for-presidential-candidates-to-address-major-issues-in-science-engineering-technology-health-and-the-environment/
http://www.sfpe.org/news/303359/SFPE-Partners-With-Leading-Scientific-and-Engineering-Societies-on-ScienceQs.htm
All best,
Shawn Otto
Chair, ScienceDebate.org
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in politics, science funding, skeptical community | Tagged: 2016, candidates, Clinton, congress, debate, Democrats, discussion, Donald Trump, engineering, funding, Gary Johnson, GOP, government, Hillary Clinton, investment, Johnson, Libertarian, money, politics, president, presidential, Republican, research, science, Science Debate, science funding, Shawn Otto, technology, Trump, U.S., U.S.A., United States, United States of America, USA | Leave a Comment »
Posted by mattusmaximus on July 24, 2015
[**Update (8-16-15): The recent manufactured controversy over the funding of Planned Parenthood is an excellent example of how anti-science has crept into U.S. politics. For more details on that, see this more recent post 🙂 ]
You may recall that in the 2008 and 2012 national election cycles, a new and extremely important effort to inject some serious discussion of scientific topics was introduced: Science Debate. The whole point of Science Debate is to get the presidential candidates (as well as other politicians) talking about science and science-related topics, so that the public can make informed decisions. And with the 2016 elections coming up next year, it’s time to get the word out about Science Debate and its place in the political discourse of the country. So please, read more about Science Debate below, sign their petition, submit questions you’d like addressed, spread the word, and donate to support this worthy cause!

About Science Debate:
Science Debate is a 501(c)(3) organization cofounded and run by volunteer citizens from a variety of walks of life who share the common vision of Thomas Jefferson that “Whenever the people are well-informed, the can be trusted with their own government.” In an age when science influences every aspect of life and lies at the heart of many of our thorniest policy challenges, we believe that candidates for office should be debating and discussing these issues, just like they debate and discuss economics, foreign policy, and even faith. Science Debate is dedicated to elevating science and engineering questions in our national civic dialogue.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in politics, science funding, skeptical community | Tagged: 2016, Bush, candidates, Clinton, congress, debate, Democrats, discussion, engineering, funding, GOP, government, investment, money, politics, president, presidential, Republican, research, science, Science Debate, science funding, Shawn Otto, technology, U.S., U.S.A., United States, United States of America, USA | 1 Comment »